Parallel Struggles of Religious Moderation Activists Amid Hindu-Muslim Tensions in India and Political Polarization in Indonesia

Authors

  • M. Azmi Alkhosyi Parinduri Parinduri UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61391/sij.v4i2.215

Keywords:

Religious Moderation, Activist Burnout, Hindu-Muslim, Identity Politics, Interfaith

Abstract

The phenomenon of religious and political polarization has created serious pressure on religious moderation work, both in India and Indonesia. In India, interfaith activists who strive to maintain harmony between Hindu and Muslim communities often face stigmatization, labeling themselves as "anti-national," and pressure from the politically dominant majority group. Meanwhile, in Indonesia, religious moderation activists also experience high social and psychological burdens, especially after the 2024 election which was colored by identity sentiment and religious-based disinformation. This article attempts to comparatively review the forms of burnout experienced by moderation activists in both countries, and explain the patterns of structural, digital, and cultural pressures that make tolerance work increasingly vulnerable and marginalized. Through a qualitative approach with literature studies, this article shows that the struggle of moderation activists is not only about defending diversity, but also about surviving amidst increasingly extreme identity politics. These findings invite readers to understand that religious moderation requires social protection, policy support, and strengthening of a healthy digital space to prevent systemic fatigue that can endanger democracy itself.

References

An-Na’im, & Abdullahi Ahmed. (2008). Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari‘a. Harvard University Press. https://eltearabszak.hu/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Abdullahi-Ahmed-An-Na-im-Islam-and-the-Secular-State_-Negotiating-the-Future-of-Sharia.pdf?utm_

Azra, & Azyumardi. (2020). Moderasi Beragama dalam Perspektif Islam Wasathiyah. Kementerian Agama RI. https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/jra/article/viewFile/15224/6387?utm_

Hasan, & Noorhaidi. (2019). Digital Populism, Religious Conservatism, and the Middle-Class: The Making of an Islamic Public Sphere in Contemporary Indonesia. Contemporary Islam, 13(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366681839_RECLAIMING_MODERATE_ISLAM_IN_NAHDLATUL_ULAMA_Challenging_the_Dominant_Religious_Authority_in_Digital_Platform?utm_

Hefner, R. W. (2011). Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia. Princeton University Press. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstreams/39aeba42-aa85-48b0-9e51-5bfac8de8ae4/download?utm_

Jaffrelot, & Christophe. (2019). Modi’s India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy. Princeton University Press. https://thesvi.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/modis-india-hindu-nationalism-and-the-rise-of-ethnic-democracy-188-192.pdf?utm_

Latif, & Yudi. (2019). Wawasan Kebangsaan: Moderasi Beragama dan Pembangunan Karakter Bangsa. Mizan.

Mudzakkir, & Agus. (2020). Moderasi Beragama dan Tantangannya di Indonesia Kontemporer. Jurnal Bimas Islam, 13(1). https://balitbangdiklat.kemenag.go.id/upload/files/Moderasi_Beragama_di_Tengah_Isu_Kontemporer.pdf?utm_

Noor, & Farish A. (2003). Islam Embedded: The Historical Development of the Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party PAS, 1951–2003. Malaysian Sociological Research Institute. https://books.google.com/books/about/Islam_Embedded.html?id=TU2yXwAACAAJ&utm_

Pandey, & Gyanendra. (2001). Violence, Nationalism and History in India. Cambridge University Press. https://www.shivajicollege.ac.in/sPanel/uploads/econtent/60e55c256deccf1db389089d24723bd4.pdf?utm_

Varshney, & Ashutosh. (2002). Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India. Yale University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-02